Prof. Dr. Thomas Kropf
Strategic sparring for executives, boards and technology teams facing complex decisions in AI, software and industrial innovation.
About
"I don't believe in buzzwords. I believe in systems you can explain."
Technology creates value only when it is genuinely understood — not just deployed. That's the question I've spent 30 years working on: how technological possibility becomes reliable, scalable impact.
As EVP and Head of Corporate Research at Bosch, I led a global team of 1,600+ researchers, merged Bosch Research with the Bosch Center for AI, and tripled innovation output. I established Bosch's first autonomous driving project — a prototype cleared for German public roads by the TÜV within 18 months — and professionalized the "grow" start-up platform, bringing several ventures to commercial independence and external funding.
Today I work with leaders facing these same questions — on boards, with technology teams, at conferences, and at the University of Tübingen where I teach computer science.
Current
Selected Former Board & Advisory Roles
Point of View
These questions connect all my work: How does technological possibility become reliable impact? How do organisations stay capable of decisive action as systems grow more complex? And how does AI become a leadership discipline — rather than a permanent experiment?
What I Offer
I'm most useful when
Working directly with CEOs, CTOs and boards on technology roadmaps, architectural decisions and the strategic questions at the intersection of deep tech and business. Structure where it matters most.
Building the logic for scaling — from product architecture to decision frameworks to investor communication. For technology founders who need industrial credibility alongside their ambition.
Speaking on AI, systems thinking and industrial futures — drawing on 30 years of experience turning research into reality. From board-level settings to industry conferences.
Long-term engagement with supervisory boards, venture builders and research institutions. Translating technological depth into governance clarity — for decisions that carry real weight.
Navigating a critical decision on AI strategy, software architecture, or technology governance? I'd like to hear from you.